|"Say, Ariel, any idea who's winning?"|
You can read Rob's reply to my last post at Gamasutra, but in the interest of completeness, here it is:
Rob: Growth and change? Don't you know videogames are all about shooting aliens in the face?
In all seriousness, I think JULIUS CAESAR would make a good videogame because of the emphasis on action and conflict. As much as I enjoy it, THE TEMPEST seems to be a story mainly about people almost doing something, but then deciding against it.
In JULIUS CAESAR Brutus and Cassius are forced to kill a dear friend for the sake of Rome, and Rome is bribed to side against them. Then they must fight a war which was evenly matched until Brutus made a strategic error.
Certainly, the play was Shakespeare's most accurate (though it includes dubious incidents of ghosts), but that doesn't mean that the game needs to be 'trapped by the facts of history.' To convert a play to a game means introducing some nonlinearity, so we can ask and answer a bunch of what-if questions in this game.
What if Caesar had found out about the plot? What if he'd stayed at home instead of going to the senate? What if Brutus were a better orator, or strategist? We could even go so far as to change the setting entirely. This story could be set in the Mafia of the 1930s, a Galactic Federation, or a Pirate Ship.
In contrast, THE TEMPEST must include a wizard and a fairy and a freakish beast-man. There aren't a lot of settings that can accomodate that.
I think the many story threads of THE TEMPEST are a weakness rather than a strength. The perspective of this play is not high enough to be a god-game or management sim, and not low enough for a first-person experience. I'll admit that THE TEMPEST was a tempting choice, because of superficial similarities to fantasy-genre games, but I think there's less there than meets the eye.
Maybe I'm just lacking imagination. How do you imagine a TEMPEST video game playing out?
Kerr: To begin with, I want to bookmark some ideas and return to them at a later post. First, I would like to explore the idea of moving Julius Caesar to another setting. This is a time-honored tradition in Shakespearean production. I would say today it is standard practice to costume in modern business suits, and of course, Orson Welles created a landmark modern fascist interpretation in 1936. I suppose I hadn't considered that possibility, and it opens up a lot more of the plays, especially those that have traditionally been reset in different times and places, such as Othello and Macbeth and the ever-lovin' Midsummer's Night Dream. Personally, I would like to set all the romantic comedies aside, as the stakes, typically who will end up side-by-side at the altar, do not feel like a "fit" for gaming. But we need to explore the idea of divorcing Shakespeare's narrative from its original settings -- and doing so gives license to ignore those pesky historical facts that troubled me so.
This does place a sideways finger on the inherent flaw in the entire concept--we are attempting to engage Shakespeare's power without his language. I must admit that I cannot conceive how that can be incorporated, but I would like to see how we can. It is true that Shakespeare took his received materials and wielded them into different, more complex, and more resonant narrative shapes, but that is still not why he is the most revered writer in the world. It comes down to the very words themselves and we ignore them at our peril. But I await instruction as to how blank verse and other Shakespeare text can be employed as an integral part of a game, and not just a decorative feature. Could there be tasks or goals associated with language which are required to progress in the game?
Back to The Tempest. I am probably going to reveal the depths of my ignorance about gaming, but in my simple understanding, the most successful games are social multi-player games in which people explore a universe, rather than simply being a god controlling others. That was my template for Tempest. Certainly somebody would want to be Prospero seeking to regain his dukedom. You could be Caliban seeking to perform tasks to achieve independence from Prospero or Ariel seeking to earn your freedom from Prospero. You could be Alonso or Antonio, seeking Ferdinand and escape from the island. You could be Ferdinand, seeking to perform the tasks to be worthy of Miranda. You could even by Miranda, striving to become an independent adult away from her father. And for any role not being adopted by a player, the game could take on that role from sets of pre-determined alternative tracks. And Stephano and Trinculo can work as all-purpose troublemakers, available to thwart anyone's goals and plans. The design trick is to figure out how these interact, and how, for example, an action of Caliban could alter the Antonio plotline, or something Miranda does could impact Ariel's quest.
But maybe I am getting ahead of my self. If I were directing The Tempest for the stage, I would never run down any of these story or even character rabbit holes until I had decided what the play was about. Once I've landed on that, all my other decisions can proceed therefrom. It is unecessary to come up with the final and definitive answer as to the meaning or themes of any given play; one simply has to latch on an idea or ideas -- no more than two or three, tops -- that are supported by the text and which can help the play sustain in performance. So, for instance, Hamlet is about dozens of different things, but if the director decides the play is about Betrayal then everything everyone does can proceed from there. The set, costume and lighting designer, the way the actors move and interact, the choice of goals within scenes --everything can be interpreted through the lens of "betrayal."
So what is The Tempest about, and what would be a good choice for a game design? We have already talked about freedom and confinement, as reflected by Caliban, Ariel, Ferdinand, Miranda and the enchanted passengers of the wrecked ship. Prospero is even arguably confined by his desire to reverse the wrongs of the past, a desire from which he needs liberation. That connects to another theme, reconciliation and forgiveness. This could present serious challenges for a game driven by pre-determined logic, but perhaps receiving forgiveness can be broken into steps which need to be performed properly. There is a conflict between the natural and technological worlds, if we interpret magic as a type of techonology. Or we could look at magic as something between nature and technology -- man-made, but drawing on secret natural aspects of the universe.
Why this English-class discussion of themes? Because we need to decide why we're making the game. We need some criterion to couch all the other decisions. We need something that will keep us moving in a defined direction, because it is clearly easy to get lost in the woods.
I don't know if what I'm imagining is technologically feasible -- a more straightforward story with clearly defined goals might be far better. It's easy to come up with an adaptation of Macbeth as a first-person-stabber game. But I am also looking to explore those aspects that make Shakespeare Shakespeare. Nowadays, thanks to Joseph Campbell, we all know how to cook up a hero's journey by the numbers. Thus I am drawn to the more particular, the more peculiar, the more inconsistent and the more complex elements that constitute Shakespeare, especially from mid-career on.
Or am I just talking through my wizard's hat?